Goldman's biggest prime-broker client of 2026 was a two-year-old AI fund running four-times leverage

Goldman collected more than $200 million in fees from Leopold Aschenbrenner's two-year-old fund this year, more than from any other prime-brokerage client, per the FT. That client no longer borrows, and the fee machine it ran on has stopped.

In this storyGSAMDCRWVAnthropic
Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 3 min read
Share
Goldman Sachs headquarters at 200 West Street in Lower Manhattan, its glass facade catching the sun.
1 / 6Slide 1 of 6
Goldman Sachs headquarters at 200 West Street, New York. The bank collected more than $200 million in fees from Situational Awareness this year.

He called the crash a buying chance, then lost the book

Six days before Ken Griffin's Citadel absorbed his fund's entire public-equity book, Leopold Aschenbrenner wrote to investors that July's AI rout offered "some of the most attractive opportunities since early 2025" and invited fresh capital by 1 August 2026 1. The capital never came. Margin calls from Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Bank of America did, and on 30 July the whole public book went to Citadel 1.

The invoice for the leverage era just landed

Goldman earned more than $200 million in fees from Situational Awareness this year, people familiar with the matter told the Financial Times, more than from any other prime-brokerage client 23. The fund also ranked among the bank's biggest trading-division clients overall this year, the FT report noted 2. A fund founded in 2024 sharing league-table space with Citadel and Millennium is, in Oninvest's summary, virtually unprecedented on Wall Street 4. Goldman was one of its main lenders, and the fund remains a client 2.

Fees on the way up, a margin call on the way down

The client was built on borrowed money. Situational Awareness launched in 2024 with $225 million in seed capital, ran its public book at roughly four-times leverage and returned 439 percent in the first half of 2026 alone 15. Assets touched about $45 billion at the start of July, then fell to roughly $10 billion after the forced sale 16.

Citadel took the roughly $16 billion book at a discount understood to be near 10 percent 56. Goldman got paid on the way up, Citadel bought on the way down, and the limited partners met the margin call: the portfolio dropped 67 percent in July, coming "closer to permanent capital impairment than is acceptable to us" 7.

A $225 million launch became $45 billion, then $10 billion, in two years

$0$20$40$60Launch, 2024Jul 2026 peakAfter Citadel sale$10Margin calls, then the Citadelsale
Data
Assets under management
Launch, 2024$0.23
Jul 2026 peak$45
After Citadel sale$10
Reported assets under management, US$ billions, at three moments; figures approximate as reported. From Tech Times, CNBC and Quartz reporting, July to September 2026.1,6,8

JPMorgan walked, Goldman kept the account

JPMorgan ended its lending relationship with the fund after the losses 7. Goldman, Citigroup and Bank of America still execute for it, and the fund has added Clear Street as a broker 7. The SEC has subpoenaed all four banks over the fund's trades, leverage and communications with lenders; no wrongdoing has been alleged, and the fund says it will cooperate with any request 6. Goldman and the fund declined to comment on the fee figure 4.

The fee machine is switched off

The fund told investors in July it would no longer borrow to size positions, Oninvest reports 4. In September it came back to public markets through options on AMD, Bloom Energy, CoreWeave and SK Hynix, instruments that spend premium instead of owing margin 8. Citadel has unwound more than 80 percent of the risk it bought, in over 100 block trades worth more than $4 billion 8. An Anthropic stake up 620 percent this year keeps the fund up roughly 80 percent 9. Aschenbrenner's own words close the ledger: "not blowing up is task number one and two" 9. Watch whether any client ever pays Goldman like this again without borrowed money.

How this brief was made

01Gathered & sourced328 channels · 1,087 articles▾

Agents swept 328 channels and ingested 1,087 articles, then de-duplicated and ranked them for signal.

02Verified & cross-validated9 claims · 38 data feeds▾
03Reviewed & edited1 human editor▾

One editor read the draft against the evidence, tuned the framing, and signed off before it shipped.

Become a contributor

Reporting on the business of AI and want it read? We take pitches from outside contributors who bring primary sources and a number worth arguing about.

Share

Deepdive

AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.

Reader comments

0 comments

    Sign up

    Get your curated digest

    After email confirmation, you will receive a daily digest of the most relevant news that matter to your portfolio