Pentagon keeps its Anthropic blacklist; the $2T IPO inherits the fight

A 2-1 D.C. Circuit panel let the Pentagon's supply-chain-risk ban on Claude stand on 25 September, the same week the White House leaned on Anthropic to hold its newest model back from British testers. Behind the stay sits a November listing that could value the lab near $2 trillion.

Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 3 min read
Share
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in an official portrait, seated at a desk.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. A D.C. Circuit panel on 25 September let his department's supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic stand.

The blacklist stands, on a 2-1 vote

A federal appeals panel in Washington ruled on 25 September that the Pentagon lawfully branded Anthropic a supply-chain risk, a ban that keeps Claude out of the US military and away from every contractor working for it 1. Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao, both Trump appointees, sided with the department; Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson dissented 1. The panel held its ruling back only so Anthropic can try for a rehearing, an en banc hearing, or the Supreme Court 1.

The defense account was never the money

Anthropic's Pentagon work sat under a July 2025 contract with a ceiling of up to $200 million, the same ceiling OpenAI, Google and xAI signed that month 2. What is actually at stake is the listing: a November debut that could value the company near $2 trillion and raise as much as $100 billion 3. Anthropic has said the designations cost it revenue as customers hesitated to buy from a company the government was pushing away, and it has never put a figure on the loss 4.

Claude sales septupled while the blacklist was litigated

  • Revenue run rate
  • Estimate
$0B$50B$100BEnd of 2025End of July 20262026 full year$100Bblacklist in force since March
Data
Revenue run rate
End of 2025$9B
End of July 2026$65B
2026 full year (estimate)$100B
Annualized revenue run rate, US dollars. The 2026 full-year point is a reported expectation, not a booked figure, and is drawn as an estimate.3,7

Gatekeeper on Thursday, security risk on Friday

The ruling landed the day after word surfaced that the White House had asked Anthropic and OpenAI to hold new models back from Britain's AI Security Institute until the US government tested them first 5. Anthropic complied: Claude Mythos 5.1 shipped "only available to a set of U.S. organizations" 5. Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco ruled last month that the parallel designation covering federal contracts was unlawful; Friday's decision leaves the defense label standing indefinitely 146.

What the majority accepted, and the dissent rejected

Katsas wrote that Anthropic's built-in limits mean "these restrictions have stopped Claude from performing tasks requested by government users," and that "it is the President and the Secretary of War who must determine how best to balance the competing risks" 16. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had accused the lab of trying to "seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military" 1. Henderson answered that Congress wrote the 2018 supply-chain law against sabotage by hostile foreign powers, not safety rules from an American company 6.

The loss may not survive a fuller court

Neither remaining appeal is guaranteed. En banc review by the full D.C. Circuit and review by the Supreme Court are both discretionary, and legal analysts expect Anthropic to win before a full bench that mixes four presidents' appointees, and probably at the high court, if either takes the case 6. The account moves on regardless: the Pentagon has been replacing Claude with SpaceX's Grok, Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT models, and OpenAI's classified-network deployment deal was announced on 28 February 24.

Days to pick a door

The petition window is open now and the roadshow is close: marketing could begin in mid-October, with the listing set for days before the November midterms 7. Shareholders are meanwhile being asked to hand the seven co-founders, who own roughly 2% each, a 50.1% voting bloc before the bell 89. The company that wants a majority of the vote is still waiting on two courts for the rest.

How this brief was made

Become a contributor

Reporting on the business of AI and want it read? We take pitches from outside contributors who bring primary sources and a number worth arguing about.

Share

Deepdive

AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.

Reader comments

0 comments

    Sign up

    Get your curated digest

    After email confirmation, you will receive a daily digest of the most relevant news that matter to your portfolio