For the second time, DISA says only Leidos can finish DODNet, with 231,000 users due
A protest-forced redo of DISA's sole-source case for the 11 combatant commands landed Monday where June's did: with Leidos alone. The same week, one of the 24 firms DISA ruled out beat Leidos for a $121.4 million cyber contract.
Vincent Jiang · 3 min read
The do-over lands where it started
The Defense Information Systems Agency re-posted its sole-source case on 28 September for folding the 11 combatant commands into Leidos's $11.5 billion Defense Enclave Services contract, keeping the June original's approval number, JA26-059 12. General Dynamics IT had protested that first attempt on 10 July, flagging waived market research, no fresh pricing determination and no plan to lower barriers to future competition, sections the June document had marked "not applicable" 45. DISA pulled the expansion back and went looking for evidence 12.
The search was brisk. A sources-sought notice issued 27 July gave industry about eight days to answer; the second, issued 27 August, gave 24 hours 62. Twenty-four companies replied anyway, with GDIT, Booz Allen, Accenture, Peraton and SAIC among them 1.
Twenty-four answers, one verdict
The verdict survived the exercise. DISA again put it in the agency's own words: "Leidos is the only responsible source capable of meeting the [Defense Department chief information officer] migration deadlines" 2. The barrier is authorship: rivals would need access to "the author of the migration script" to adapt DODNet's automation scripts, Active Directory schemas and identity, credential and access management structures 2. The ceiling stays $11.5 billion, the added work's value is redacted, and DISA prices a competition at $15 million in duplicated engineering 12.
The arithmetic DISA signed
A May memo from Pentagon CIO Kirsten Davies set the clock: every combatant command onto DODNet by 30 September 2028 42. The added scope is 231,000 users at 200 sites across 11 commands 1. Leidos's four-year record under Enclave is 40,000 users at 900 sites across 14 agencies 1, against an original solicitation sized at no fewer than 370,000 users 4.
Spread the new users over the two fiscal years left and the required pace is roughly 115,000 a year, more than eleven times the average managed since 2022. DISA's answer is that automated scripts have already cut migration times from months to weeks 1. The case for lock-in is that only the author of the migration scripts can finish the migration, and the author's four-year record is 40,000 users.
Four years moved 40,000 users onto DODNet; the bid floor was 370,000 and 231,000 more are due
- Users
- Estimate
Data
| Users | |
|---|---|
| 2022 solicitation floor | 370,000 users |
| Migrated by Oct 2026 | 40,000 users |
| Due by Sept 2028 (estimate) | 231,000 users |
The same week, a ruled-out rival took Leidos's cyber work
Customs and Border Protection reached a different verdict on Leidos's cyber credentials. Accenture Federal Services' $121.4 million, five-year contract for the Cyber Security Operations Center took effect on 1 October 3. Leidos held the work; it has noticed 84 layoffs in Ashburn for 23 November, after 93 in March 3. Accenture was among the 24 respondents DISA just ruled out 1.
Skeptics hold that warfighting networks are not back-office consolidation, and that a one-day response window looked less like research than ritual 26.
Visibility is the trade; the risks carry dates
The ledger behind the argument: second-quarter revenue of $4.56 billion, up 7.2 percent, backlog of $48.71 billion, up 5.4 percent, and full-year guidance near $18.3 billion 78. If the expansion stands, it is revenue visibility at an unchanged ceiling, priced in secret. The risks carry dates: a migration pace never demonstrated at this scale, and a GDIT that protested Enclave's 2022 award, lost, and has not said whether it will go again 41.
Revenue climbed to a record $4.56B in the quarter DISA re-ran its case
Data
| Revenue | |
|---|---|
| Q3 '24 | $4.19B |
| Q4 '24 | $4.37B |
| Q1 '25 | $4.25B |
| Q2 '25 | $4.25B |
| Q3 '25 | $4.47B |
| Q4 '25 | $4.21B |
| Q1 '26 | $4.4B |
| Q2 '26 | $4.56B |
Deepdive
AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.



