Musk calls Micron's prices reasonable as Micron fell 14% and $150 billion sits locked in

Elon Musk called Micron "reasonable" on memory prices and the rest of the market "extortionate" as Micron fell 14% in four sessions on a Chinese rival's server-memory plan. Micron's own filings show $150 billion of take-or-pay demand already locked in, which is what makes the grade matter.

Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 2 min read
Share
Elon Musk smiling during his TED2017 interview with Chris Anderson on stage in Vancouver
1 / 6Slide 1 of 6
Elon Musk in his TED2017 interview with Chris Anderson. On October 13 Musk called Micron "reasonable" on future memory prices and other suppliers "extortionate."

The biggest memory buyer graded his suppliers in public

On October 13 Elon Musk wrote on X that "Micron−3.24% — Micron, down 3.24 percent today has been reasonable regarding future memory prices, while others have been extortionate, which is something today's customers won't forget," calling Micron's stance "the smart move for long-term customer loyalty" 1. Musk buys memory at industrial scale: his xAI$200B — xAI, private, latest valuation $200B runs the Colossus data-center complex near Memphis, and he said on October 2 that Tesla−0.86% — Tesla, down 0.86 percent today cut the memory on its AI5 robot chip by a third, to 96GB, because that was "the only way to get enough volume for Optimus production" 12. He named Samsung, TSMC+0.36% — TSMC, up 0.36 percent today and Micron as suppliers to his planned Terafab chip project in April, and left the extortionate ones unnamed 1.

The tape prices a supply flood; the filings price a lock-in

Micron fell more than 14% over four sessions through October 13, closing down 3.6% on the day, after ChangXin Memory Technologies' president, Cao Kanyu, told a Shanghai conference on October 10 that CXMT would ship denser 4F² DDR5 server memory modules by the end of 2026 134. The Philadelphia semiconductor index logged a fifth straight loss, SK Hynix dropped more than 10% in Seoul and Samsung 7.4% 35. What the selling is not pricing: on September 30 Micron disclosed roughly $150 billion of contracted future revenue under 26 long-term agreements, every one take-or-pay, covering more than 35% of its revenue through 2030 and backed by $32 billion of customer commitments, mostly cash deposits 67. That book exceeds the $133.2 billion Micron sold in all of fiscal 2026, and it is counted at minimum pricing where price frameworks are already set 67. Contract prices for DRAM, NAND and high-bandwidth memory had already surged 80–90% in the first quarter of 2026, Counterpoint Research found 1.

A Micron DDR5 server memory module, a registered DIMM with ECC, photographed top down
A Micron DDR5-4800 server module (registered DIMM with ECC), the product class CXMT says it will ship by the end of 2026. · PantheraLeo1359531

Micron revenue has multiplied sixfold in eight quarters, and the next quarter is guided higher anyway

  • Revenue
  • Estimate
$0B$20B$40B$60B$80BQ4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26Q3 '26Q4 '26$54.23BGuided 30 Sept, mid-selloff
Data
Revenue
Q4 '24$8.71B
Q1 '25$8.05B
Q2 '25$9.3B
Q3 '25$11.32B
Q4 '25$13.64B
Q1 '26$23.86B
Q2 '26$41.46B
Q3 '26$54.23B
Q4 '26 (estimate)$61.5B ($60–63B)
Quarterly revenue in US$ billions, SEC filings, labeled by calendar quarter. Q4 '26 is company guidance of $61.5B ± $1.5B issued September 30, 2026.7,8

The caveats that decide it

CXMT has yet to show it can build 4F² at commercial yields, its DDR5 cost per bit runs an estimated 30% above the incumbents, and Apple−0.13% — Apple, down 0.13 percent today reportedly walked away from CXMT supply talks after finding no price advantage 3. Micron's finance chief, Mark Murphy, says he has "no line of sight" to the shortage easing, and JPMorgan expects shortages through 2028 12. The post Musk replied to put more than 75% of Micron's fiscal 2027 output as already sold, though that figure is the analyst's relay, not a Micron filing 1. Watch whether CXMT ships and qualifies server DDR5 by year-end, and whether the suppliers Musk left unnamed start losing orders. In a shortage any maker can name a price; only one is paying for the right to keep its customers when the shortage ends.

Deepdive

AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.

Reader comments

0 comments

    Sign up

    Get your curated digest

    After email confirmation, you will receive a daily digest of the most relevant news that matter to your portfolio