Nebius Borrowed Against Microsoft and Meta to Build the Machine They Prepaid
The $40 billion of signed business and the borrowing base are the same two contracts, and November 10 shows whether the build can outrun the concentration.
Vincent Jiang · 2 min read
Nebius tells investors it holds more than $40 billion of contracted revenue from investment-grade customers, and the contracts behind that number name two companies: Microsoft and Meta 1. Microsoft signed first, in September 2025, for about $17.4 billion of dedicated capacity through 2031, growing to roughly $19.4 billion if it buys extras 1. Meta added about $3 billion in November and $12 billion of dedicated capacity from early 2027, with up to $15 billion more payable only on clusters Nebius cannot sell to anyone else 1. Count the firm parts and the two names cover about $32 billion, roughly four-fifths of the headline; count every "up to" and it is about $49 billion 1.
Four-fifths of Nebius' signed commitments is Microsoft and Meta
- Estimate
Data
| Value | Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft, firm | $17.4B | — |
| Meta, firm | $15B | — |
| Meta, up to | $15B | — |
| Microsoft, extras (est.) (estimate) | $2B | $0–2B |
The collateral is the same two names
The concentration is not just a revenue story; it is a balance sheet story. Chief financial officer Dado Alonso put it plainly on the August earnings call: "We currently have approximately $40 billion of committed backlog that we can borrow against" 1. That borrowing base sits against a capex plan of $20 billion to $25 billion this year and trailing twelve-month free cash flow of minus $9.61 billion 2.
Quarterly capex has run from $0.5B to $5.65B in six quarters against a $20-25B year guide
Data
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Q1 '25 | $0.54B |
| Q2 '25 | $0.51B |
| Q3 '25 | $0.96B |
| Q4 '25 | $2.06B |
| Q1 '26 | $2.47B |
| Q2 '26 | $5.65B |
Capex has outrun revenue in every quarter since Nebius began building
- Capital expenditure
- Revenue
Data
| Capital expenditure | Revenue | |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 '24 | $0.17B | $0.03B |
| Q4 '24 | $0.42B | $0.04B |
| Q1 '25 | $0.54B | $0.05B |
| Q2 '25 | $0.51B | $0.11B |
| Q3 '25 | $0.96B | $0.15B |
| Q4 '25 | $2.06B | $0.23B |
| Q1 '26 | $2.47B | $0.4B |
| Q2 '26 | $5.65B | $0.58B |
The clock: 36% converts in two years
Only 36% of the $37.5 billion remaining performance obligations at June 30, about $13.5 billion, is expected to become revenue within 24 months 1. The rest is the construction schedule. Second-quarter revenue was $582.3 million, up 454%, with annualized run-rate revenue of $3.0 billion guided to $7 billion to $9 billion by December 2. Hitting the midpoint means booking 2.3 times first-half revenue in the second half, and the Meta build on Nvidia's Vera Rubin platform is still unfinished, with discounted fees already promised for late delivery 1.
The Meta backstop also runs backwards, by the same filing's wording: if AI demand eases and other customers pass on that cluster, Meta must buy more of it, making Nebius more concentrated, not less 1.
What the multiple assumes
At 51 times trailing revenue, the stock prices a customer list far wider than the one on file 2. The list is widening only slowly: four second-quarter contracts above $1 billion each, including model makers Reflection and Cohere, and unnamed customers at 24%, 21% and 14% of quarterly revenue 1. Third-quarter results on November 10 test the math: revenue likely needs to clear $850 million and run-rate revenue should reach $4.5 billion to $5 billion to keep the year-end guide credible 2. Until then, four-fifths of the collateral is still two names.
Unnamed customers hold the three largest shares of quarterly revenue
Data
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Unnamed customer 1 | 24% |
| Unnamed customer 2 | 21% |
| Unnamed customer 3 | 14% |
Deepdive
AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.

