The secondary fund behind Estonia's tech ranking just put Veriff back at €1.8 billion
TopTech 2026 puts Veriff third among Estonia's tech companies at €1.811 billion, its first mark in the table for two years. By the ranking's own method the number is a model, not a transacted price, and one of its two compilers is a secondary-market investor.
Vincent Jiang · 3 min read
TopTech 2026, the annual valuation of Estonia's 30 most valuable technology companies, landed on 30 September with a familiar name back in third: Veriff, at €1.811 billion, behind Wise (€10.981 billion) and Bolt (€7.086 billion) 12. It is the identity verifier's first mark in the table for two years; its data was "simply not available" to the compilers before 1. The headlines went to Blackwall, a cyber security firm whose valuation jumped 368 per cent to a €1.03 billion unicorn mark 13. The money question is Veriff's.
Nearly five years without a price
Veriff's last priced trade was a $100 million Series C in January 2022, at a $1.5 billion valuation, co-led by Tiger Global and Alkeon 4. Everyone holding since, from employees to investors Y Combinator, Accel and IVP, has carried a print from another market era 4.
The number is a model, not a print
TopTech's rules price a company off its latest round only if that round closed within 12 months; after that the mark comes from an investor's fair-value assessment or a turnover multiple benchmarked against listed peers, and the compilers do not say which they applied 1. Veriff has not raised on the public record since January 2022 4. The table supplies raw material, a 32 per cent two-year sales CAGR 2, but no transaction. The €1.811 billion is a modelled mark, not a price anyone has disclosed paying.
One compiler invests in the paper it prices
The same table says the model's benchmark world is shrinking: the top 30's combined value slipped to €26.4 billion from €27.7 billion, the B2B SaaS cohort fell 32.4 per cent, Wise and Bolt together fell about 15 per cent, and the top five hold 84.6 per cent of everything 12. One of the ranking's two compilers, Siena Secondary Fund, invests in secondary market technology paper 1. The house that co-writes these marks trades in what they price.
One cyber firm rose 368 per cent while Estonia's two biggest and its SaaS names fell
Data
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Blackwall | 368% |
| Frankenburg | 89% |
| Wallester | 46% |
| Threod | 45% |
| Scoro | 5% |
| Wise | -12% |
| Bolt | -20% |
| Pipedrive | -34% |
| Toggl | -37% |
| DefSecIntel | -47% |
The category re-priced in cash around it
While Veriff's mark stayed a model, identity security changed hands in real money in the weeks before the table. Socure took $156 million at a $5.2 billion valuation on 27 August, a Series E extension led by Summit Partners that included a tender for employee shares; its previous round, $450 million at $4.5 billion, was nearly five years old 5. Cyera announced $400 million from Goldman Sachs Alternatives on 22 September at more than $12 billion 67. Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) appears in both, a participant at Socure and the whole of Cyera's extension 56.
Identity security has re-priced in cash around Veriff's 2022 price
- Round valuation
- Estimate
Data
| Round valuation | |
|---|---|
| Veriff, Jan 2022 | $1.5B |
| Socure, 2021 | $4.5B |
| Socure, Aug 2026 | $5.2B |
| Cyera, Sep 2026 (estimate) | $12B |
Veriff also carries a scar those rivals do not: a late-2025 breach exposed images of government-issued identity documents belonging to about 8,583 Total Wireless customers, and drew class actions 4. For a company whose product is guarding exactly those documents, that is the asymmetry a buyer prices.
Only real money settles Veriff's mark
What would settle it is real money at Veriff: a round, a tender, a sale, any of them. Socure's extension shows the template, primary capital plus an employee tender 5. Until someone writes such a cheque, Estonia's third-most-valuable technology company is worth exactly what a secondary fund and an M&A adviser say it is worth.
Deepdive
AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.


