Jane Street lost $15 billion in July and still set a record. Now regulators want to know who financed it

A $15 billion July loss still left the trading firm ahead of its record 2025, and a $14.6 billion bond sale moved its funding toward asset managers. Now the Fed and the Bank of England are asking banks what they are owed by trading firms like it.

In this storyJane StreetOpenAIGS
Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 3 min read
Share
The Lower Manhattan skyline from the East River, with the tower housing Jane Street Capital's offices among the financial district skyscrapers.
The Lower Manhattan towers that house Jane Street Capital's offices, seen from the East River. The Federal Reserve and the Bank of England are now asking banks about their exposure to trading firms like it.

A bad month, in the firm's own words

"July was a bad month," Jane Street partner Turner Batty wrote to staff. The ledger beneath the note: about $15 billion lost, the firm's first monthly loss in roughly a decade, as its stake in the AI hedge fund Situational Awareness collapsed and several of the largest memory and semiconductor stocks fell around 50 percent 13. The fund, run by former OpenAI researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner, sold most of its public equities to Citadel after margin calls 12.

Two months later, the questions land

The Federal Reserve and the Bank of England are asking global banks what they lend large trading firms, how that exposure moved intraday, and whether risk controls held 2. The SEC has already subpoenaed Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Citigroup and Bank of America over the fund's leverage and the trades that triggered the margin calls 2. One report puts Goldman's financing fees from the fund above $200 million this year, the largest in its hedge-fund prime brokerage; that figure is single-source 8.

The loss that didn't dent the year

By mid-August the firm had booked more than $40 billion of net trading revenue for 2026, past the $39.6 billion record it set for all of 2025 and beyond any Wall Street bank 13. Days later it sold $14.6 billion of bonds across three tranches, with PIMCO, Capital Group and Fidelity buying, to repay floating-rate loans and fund technology infrastructure 3. Funding is shifting from bank desks to asset managers while supervisors question the bank desks.

Now it sells the leverage retail buys

This year the firm also began writing the swaps behind leveraged single-stock ETFs: about $1.2 billion of notional across roughly 75 funds in the second quarter, near 2 percent of a segment Clear Street leads at about 21 percent 4. Goldman Sachs and Nomura each hold around 10 percent 5. Notional is reference exposure, not capital at risk 5.

Clear Street leads single-stock ETF swaps at 21%; Jane Street, new this year, holds 2%

0%5%10%15%20%25%Clear Street21%Marex11%Goldman Sachs10%Nomura10%Jane Street2%entered earlier this year
Data
Value
Clear Street21%
Marex11%
Goldman Sachs10%
Nomura10%
Jane Street2%
Share of US-listed leveraged and inverse single-stock ETF swap notional, Q2 2026, per an Asym Research compilation of fund filings reported by Bloomberg and Disruption Banking; figures approximate and rounded; notional measures reference exposure, not capital at risk.4,5

The crack behind a paywall

A Jane Street-leased data center in central Oklahoma was funded with $2.25 billion of five-year green bonds in August, priced to yield almost 9 percent 6. A paywalled report on 20 September says that debt has soured; the detail beneath the headline could not be checked here 7. The Bank of England warned in February that trading firms depend on banks for leverage, clearing and market access, and that intraday counterparty risk had risen "in lockstep" 5.

What to watch

Third-quarter fund filings will show whether that 2 percent share grows 5. If supervisors judge banks too exposed, the tool on the table is more high-quality liquid assets held against those exposures, a cost the banks carry 8. The prop risk left the banks after the last crisis. The financing never left with it 8.

How this brief was made

Become a contributor

Reporting on the business of AI and want it read? We take pitches from outside contributors who bring primary sources and a number worth arguing about.

Share

Deepdive

AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.

Reader comments

0 comments

    Sign up

    Get your curated digest

    After email confirmation, you will receive a daily digest of the most relevant news that matter to your portfolio