Health

Midjourney Wants to Scan Your Body. Diagnosis Isn’t Included.

Midjourney's launch essay imagines early imaging avoiding 30% of deaths. The scanner it is actually building is meant to map fat and muscle. The evidence for the bigger story has not been published.

Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 3 min read
Share
David Holz, seated at a desk, gestures above a small Leap Motion sensor while co-founder Michael Buckwald looks on
David Holz (center) demonstrates the Leap Motion controller beside co-founder Michael Buckwald in 2013, more than a decade before Midjourney's scanner. The blue sensing cone is Popular Science's graphic. Photo: Cody Pickens for Popular Science.

David Holz announced an astrology acquisition in July while planning a spa that will scan your body. His company, Midjourney, reportedly generated $300 million in 2024.1 Selling images has given him room to pursue something considerably more intimate.

The medical vision reaches far beyond the first product, which is intended to measure body composition, not diagnose disease.

The promise is bigger than the product

In its June launch essay, Midjourney imagines a future where early imaging could avoid 30% of deaths and 50% of healthcare costs.8 Those are speculative possibilities for early imaging broadly, not demonstrated benefits of its scanner. The essay supplies no supporting outcomes study for those estimates.

That is an enormous amount of hope to hang over a product that starts with a map of your fat and muscle.

The competition is cheap and fast

That map already has a market price. BodySpec sells DEXA scans, a common benchmark for body composition, that take 6 to 11 minutes26 and cost $40 with a membership27. Gym bioimpedance machines such as InBody+1.86% — InBody, up 1.86 percent today finish in 15 seconds to two minutes.28 Midjourney reports its prototype takes 20+ minutes, against a final goal of one minute.9

Horizontal bar chart of minutes per body-composition scan: Midjourney prototype 20+ minutes (company-reported); DEXA at BodySpec 6 to 11 minutes; InBody bioimpedance 15 seconds to 2 minutes; Midjourney final goal 1 minute, not yet achieved.
The one-minute goal would put Midjourney alongside gym bioimpedance; today it trails even DEXA. Different technologies with different outputs, so this is not an accuracy comparison. Sources: Midjourney, On Medical Device Development, accessed September 10, 2026; BodySpec; InBody.

Scan time sets the economics. At 20 minutes, one scanner serves at most three customers an hour; near the one-minute goal, the scan itself stops being the bottleneck. Both figures are company statements, and there is more than a year to close the gap before the planned late-2027 opening. Until then, the scanner has to win on what its images show. Avoiding X-rays is a thin edge: BodySpec puts its DEXA dose at about four bananas' worth.26

Selling the visit

A body scan is not a health outcome; somebody still has to decide what to do next.

That decision is where the business gets uncomfortable. Midjourney describes a spa people would visit even without a scanner, with scans becoming incidental to the experience.8 The company could succeed at making customers return before establishing that repeated scans improve their health. That distinction matters whenever the health story helps sell the visit.

The Co-Star acquisition fits this consumer ambition.21 Holz says Banu Guler and her team will strengthen product and design across Midjourney.20 Building an experience people want to return to is useful expertise. It does not settle what their body data means.

If the scan finds something

If a future version starts flagging possible disease, somebody must interpret the finding, arrange follow-up and carry the cost. The American College of Radiology warns that whole-body MRI screening of people without symptoms or relevant risk factors can generate unnecessary investigations without established life-extension benefits.15,16 That is MRI evidence, not a verdict on this ultrasound device. It explains why a faster scan cannot, by itself, complete the healthcare job.

The case for Holz

Holz has a serious answer to the skeptics. He previously built hardware at Leap Motion.19 Butterfly Network's−14.91% — Butterfly Network, down 14.91 percent today annual filing confirms Midjourney paid $15 million upfront for ultrasound technology.10,11 Midjourney openly limits the initial use and reports ethics oversight for volunteer image collection.9 That oversight protects research participants; it is not independent performance validation.

Narrowing the first product is sensible. The problem is asking a narrow product to carry such a vast health narrative before it publishes evidence supporting that narrative.

Three-row table. Health outcomes: speculative vision of avoiding 30% of deaths and 50% of healthcare costs; no outcomes study supplied. Disease detection: not an intended use of the first product; none published. Body composition: the planned first use; company disclosures only, no independent accuracy data yet.
Each level of ambition needs its own proof. As of September 10, 2026, Midjourney has published company disclosures for the first rung and no outcomes study for the top one. Sources: Midjourney launch essay and development disclosure.

What to watch next

Before the planned late-2027 opening, look for independent evaluation of body-composition accuracy. Any later diagnostic or health-benefit claim needs evidence for that expanded use. The useful milestone is a result a customer can act on with justified confidence.

When Holz opens the spa, watch what the scan lets a customer decide.

Get Health by email, free

AI in medicine, pharma and biotech. In our daily email, every weekday.

Loading 041830.KQ

Reader comments

0 comments

    More in Health

    All in this topic →

    Health

    Bristol Myers locked Tempus data through 2031 and led Pathos' $237 million round; Tempus reports November 2

    Bristol Myers Squibb extended its Tempus oncology data license through 2031 and, the same week, led rival Pathos AI's $237 million Series E. Tempus reports Q3 on Monday, November 2, and the print decides which layer of its own stack the market pays for.

    Health

    Lilly raises guidance to $92 billion and hits a record close, while Novo Nordisk bets November on CagriSema

    Lilly just priced its clinical lead at 31 times earnings while Novo Nordisk trades at 12x, and Novo's November congress calendar is the last scheduled chance to argue back before retatrutide's FDA filing closes the record.

    Health

    Ozempic blindness suits top 200 as Novo Nordisk spends DKK 11 billion on buybacks

    Maria David Patten says Ozempic left her permanently blind on a label that never mentioned the risk. Europe ordered semaglutide labels updated in 2025; the FDA has not, and the suits now top 200 while Novo returns cash to shareholders.

    Health

    Philips pitches Azurion software while 3,000 of its cath lab systems sit on the FDA recall list

    The same week Philips launched UniGuide 3D Live Guidance on Azurion, the FDA logged a Class 2 recall covering more than 3,000 Azurion systems over off-spec solid-state drives, with repairs starting in December. Q3 results land with earnings per share expected at 33 cents, and the service bill arrives in Q4.

    Health

    Novo's Wegovy pill inherits a $32 billion franchise as a judge declines to block Lilly's ads

    A federal judge in Trenton declined on October 26 to block Eli Lilly's obesity-drug ads without ruling on their merits, and three days later Lilly printed 39% revenue growth built on price cuts. Novo Nordisk reports on November 4 with its pill carrying the load.

    Health

    OpenAI makes UK startup Anima its healthcare showcase as patients call the same bot a wall to care

    OpenAI's October 23 customer story hands UK startup Anima a vendor endorsement just as it enters the US and Australia. The 75% wait cut is Anima's own measurement, and this month Wantage patients called the same bot a wall to care.

    Get the newsletter

    The day's AI and market news, in your inbox every weekday.