Power

CMS Energy earns $1.44 adjusted while funding the fight against Michigan's utility money ban

Michigan votes on November 3 on Proposition 2, which would bar utilities from giving to the officials and commissioners who set their rates. CMS Energy, which needs more than $24 billion of supply-plan spending approved, put $50,000 into defeating it the same quarter it wrote off $456 million.

Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 3 min read
Share
CMS Energy chief executive Garrick Rochow
1 / 6Slide 1 of 6
CMS Energy chief executive Garrick Rochow. The company put $50,000 into the campaign against Michigan's Proposition 2 the same quarter it wrote off $456 million at NorthStar Clean Energy.

A $50,000 check, a month out from the vote

On September 30, a month before the election, CMS Energy−0.75% — CMS Energy, down 0.75 percent today, the parent of Michigan utility Consumers Energy, wrote a $50,000 check to Protect MI Free Speech, the committee campaigning against Proposition 2 in the November 3 vote 1. Michigan Energy First, a dark-money group tied to rival DTE Energy+0.08% — DTE Energy, up 0.08 percent today that does not disclose its donors, had matched the sum on August 31; utility-linked giving to the committee now totals $215,000 1.

The check is small because the fight is lopsided: Protect MI Free Speech has raised about $851,000 from all sources, against more than $8.7 million for Michiganders for Money Out of Politics, the coalition behind the measure 2. Proposition 2 would bar regulated utilities and most large state contractors from political giving and force donor disclosure for pre-election issue ads, a utility-specific ban no other state has tried 32.

After the write-off, CMS is a regulated utility story

This morning CMS reported third-quarter GAAP earnings of $0.39 a share, against $0.92 a year earlier, after a $456 million impairment and restructuring at NorthStar Clean Energy, its non-utility arm, whose assets are now held for sale 45. Adjusted earnings, which exclude the write-down, were $1.44 against $0.93, and the company reaffirmed 2026 guidance of $3.83 to $3.90 and 2027 guidance of $4.08 to $4.17 4.

Shareholders barely felt it: $214 million of the quarter's losses landed on noncontrolling interests, and net income attributable to CMS held at $123 million, flat with the second quarter 4. The equity case now rests on the regulated core. Consumers wants more than $24 billion of spending through 2030 on a 20-year supply plan of gas, solar, wind and storage 6, money recovered, with a return, from customer bills at rates the commission sets 7.

Net income attributable to CMS fell in Q2 2026 and held flat through the NorthStar write-down

$0.1B$0.2B$0.3B$0.4BQ3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26Q3 '26$0.12BNoncontrolling interests absorbed$214M of losses
Data
Net income attributable to CMS
Q3 '24$0.25B
Q4 '24$0.27B
Q1 '25$0.3B
Q2 '25$0.2B
Q3 '25$0.28B
Q4 '25$0.29B
Q1 '26$0.34B
Q2 '26$0.12B
Q3 '26$0.12B
Quarterly net income attributable to CMS Energy, in billions of US dollars, Q3 2024 to Q3 2026; Q3 2026 from the October 27 earnings release, earlier quarters from SEC filings.4,8

The regulator is on the ballot

Michigan's utility rates are set by the Public Service Commission, a three-member board appointed by the governor, not elected 7. Proposition 2 would stop utility officials and their families from donating to statewide officeholders and to commission members 3.

The money record behind the measure: the two utilities' political action committees have given more than $1.97 million to current state officials, a Detroit News poll last month put support for the ban above 71 percent, and Consumers spent over $250,000 in a failed August primary bid against a Republican incumbent, a vocal critic of the data centers behind Michigan's electricity-demand growth, which we have tracked before 1.

The defense, and what to watch

Consumers spokesperson Katie Carey said the company follows all campaign finance laws and that the measure would "shift influence away from Michigan companies and toward wealthy national donors and special interests" 2. Karley Abramson of the Citizens Research Council, which takes no position, expects a constitutional challenge and doubts the utility ban survives: because commissioners are appointed, a quid pro quo is hard to prove, and super PAC spending is carved out either way 7. Business groups have promised to sue 3.

Watch the vote on November 3, then the lawsuits, then the rate cases: the $24 billion plan does not wait for any of them 3.

Get Power by email, free

How AI's hunger for electricity moves utilities, power plants and the grid. In our daily email, every weekday.

Loading CMS

Reader comments

0 comments

    Power

    Elementl signs Korean funding deal for Ohio reactors as GE Vernova counts on a 116GW gas backlog

    Korean private capital has signed a preliminary deal worth up to $750 million to fund Elementl Power's reactors in Ohio and beyond before any customer signs. GE Vernova reports Q3 on October 28, and its gas backlog, not nuclear, is what pays.

    Power

    Amazon agrees to fund and buy power from 12 small reactors at AEP's retired Indiana coal plant

    AEP, X-energy and Amazon signed agreements on October 19 to study twelve small reactors at a retired Indiana coal plant, with Amazon paying the development bills and, if it is built, buying the output under a contract meant to cover the plant's full costs. AEP reports the morning of October 28; the thing to listen for on the call is how much of the build customers like Amazon are paying for.

    Power

    LG Energy Solution's storage bet: 50 GWh of supply waits on 2 GWh of announced demand

    The Korean battery maker's marquee European demand news is a non-binding MOU worth about 4% of the 50 GWh North American capacity it is building, while lithium contracts and a 140 GWh backlog show where the real commitments sit. Q3 earnings on November 3 test whether the announced orders convert.

    Power

    CenterPoint's answer to Harris County: a $70.7 billion grid and a $5 billion promise

    The Houston utility's third-quarter filing raises its 10-year capital plan by $4.0 billion, lifts 2026 guidance, initiates 2027 and repeats a $5 billion savings promise, the company's first on-record answer to the county's fight over who pays for AI-driven grid growth. The demand is verifiable; the savings are a forecast that three dates will test.

    Power

    Banks' $50 targets bet on FirstEnergy's 4.3 GW AI load; Pennsylvania and Ohio decide who pays

    HSBC and BMO just re-rated FirstEnergy on AI data-center load, but Pennsylvania regulators rejected its billing plan 3-2 and Ohio's Senate race has turned its money into a campaign weapon. The demand is observable; who keeps the margin is not.

    Power

    Entergy's AI savings math meets its first audit: $308 million in Arkansas, $3.4 billion in Louisiana

    Entergy's $2.1 billion and $4 billion customer-savings promises met their first outside counts this week: Arkansas regulators count $308 million shifted onto bills, and Louisiana docket math leaves $3.4 billion of Meta's gas build for other ratepayers. Two dated decisions, a December vote and an Arkansas review, now price the political risk.

    Get the newsletter

    The day's AI and market news, in your inbox every weekday.