Wall Street prices a gigawatt in orbit at $170 billion. Musk says way better by 2028

Starship reached orbit for the first time this morning. The fight it referees next is price: sell-side tags put a gigawatt of orbital AI compute at $165 to $170 billion, a retail counter-model says $68 billion falling to $43 billion, and Musk promises "way better than that by 2028."

In this storyNVDAMSSPCX
Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 3 min read
Share
SpaceX's Starship lifts off from Starbase in Texas during flight test 11, the rocket rising on a bright exhaust plume above a huge cloud of orange and grey smoke over the Gulf shoreline.
1 / 7Slide 1 of 7
Starship lifts off from Starbase, Texas, on flight test 11. Flight 14, flown today, is the first of the 14 missions to reach orbit.

Musk's answer: way better than $170 billion by 2028

The same day Starship flew to orbit for the first time, Elon Musk picked a fight about a spreadsheet. A widely shared cost thread put Wall Street's price on a gigawatt of AI compute in orbit at $160 billion to $180 billion, attributing about $165 billion to Bank of America, $170 billion to Wood Mackenzie, and more than $100 billion for launch alone to BNP Paribas 1.

Musk replied to the thread with a one-line bid: "Will be way better than that by 2028" 1. He also answered a post calling the $180 billion versions "clueless spreadsheet crimes" 2.

Flight 14 reached orbit this morning

Flight 14 left Starbase in Texas at 8:50 a.m. EDT today and reached orbit about 170 miles up after one of its 33 Raptor engines failed during ascent and was ruled no threat. The plan runs six orbits, 26 Starlink V3 deployments and a Pacific splashdown inside 10 hours, the first orbital mission after 13 deliberate suborbital hops 3.

The counter-model says $68 billion, falling to $43 billion

The thread's own numbers price a gigawatt all-in at $68 billion, falling to $43 billion 1. NextBigFuture's Brian Wang argues the banks priced the wrong rocket entirely and puts the launch bill under $1 billion, since the Nvidia chips cost the same on either end of the trip 4. Neither camp has an audited figure, and nobody has run a commercial data center in orbit 5.

Two prices for a gigawatt in orbit: $170 billion versus $43 billion

  • Estimate
$0B$50B$100B$150B$200BWood Mackenzie$170BBank of America$165BTriple a chip-packed ground buildRetail model, today$68BRetail model, by 2028$43BGround build per GW incl. chips (Morgan Stanley)
Data
Value
Wood Mackenzie (estimate)$170B
Bank of America (estimate)$165B
Retail model, today (estimate)$68B
Retail model, by 2028 (estimate)$43B
Estimated all-in cost of 1 GW of orbital AI compute, US$ billions; every bar is a model estimate, none a reported cost. Sell-side tags as attributed in the X thread Musk answered; retail model from the same thread. Reference line: Morgan Stanley illustrative 100 MW ground facility scaled to 1 GW, Rubin Ultra generation, accelerators included. Sources: [1], [4], [6].1,4,6

At $170 billion, orbital compute costs triple a ground build with chips

Morgan Stanley's illustrative ground facilities work out to $34.7 billion to $52.5 billion per gigawatt with the accelerators included 6. Against that base, the sell-side tag is more than triple the price of building on Earth.

Ground hosting on SpaceX's own deals rents for $31 billion to $48 billion per gigawatt a year, per SemiAnalysis 7. The $170 billion tag is therefore three and a half to five and a half years of revenue before a dollar of profit, on contracts buyers can exit with 90 days' notice 8.

The parties are easy to name. If the tags hold, the contract buyers facing that payback and the holders of $1.9 trillion in equity carry the gap; if $43 billion is right, the 33-gigawatt power queue becomes SpaceX's customer list 69.

The 33-gigawatt power queue is the demand case

Morgan Stanley counts a 33 GW US power shortfall through 2028, demand orbital compute could serve without queueing for a grid interconnect 6. SpaceX already runs 1.4 gigawatts of compute on the ground, pointed $15.8 billion of its $18.4 billion second-quarter capex at AI against $2.6 billion of segment revenue, and signed $14.1 billion of cloud contracts in the quarter 510.

SpaceX spent $15.8 billion on AI in Q2 against $2.6 billion of AI revenue

$0B$5B$10B$15B$20BTotal capex$18.4BCapex pointed at AI$15.8BAI segment revenue$2.6BCloud contracts signed$14.1B
Data
Value
Total capex$18.4B
Capex pointed at AI$15.8B
AI segment revenue$2.6B
Cloud contracts signed$14.1B
SpaceX, second quarter 2026, US$ billions. Capex and segment revenue as reported in SEC filings; cloud contracts signed in the quarter per The Motley Fool. Sources: [5], [10].5,10

Each booster reflight reprices the gigawatt

Polymarket prices a 74 percent chance Starship is fully reusable before 2028 11, and every booster reflight after today is a data point on the cost line. Wall Street holds both ends of this trade: its cost models tag the product at $165 billion or more per gigawatt 1, while the banks that collected $500 million in IPO fees carry $800 and $900-plus targets on the stock 9. The rocket files the rebuttal.

How this brief was made

01Gathered & sourced276 channels · 1,155 articles▾

Agents swept 276 channels and ingested 1,155 articles, then de-duplicated and ranked them for signal.

02Verified & cross-validated11 claims · 27 data feeds▾
03Reviewed & edited2 human editors▾

2 editors read the draft against the evidence, tuned the framing, and signed off before it shipped.

Become a contributor

Reporting on the business of AI and want it read? We take pitches from outside contributors who bring primary sources and a number worth arguing about.

Share

Deepdive

AI-generated from this story and its cited sources. Not investment advice.

Reader comments

0 comments

    Sign up

    Get your curated digest

    After email confirmation, you will receive a daily digest of the most relevant news that matter to your portfolio