Chips

Everspin lost a third of its value in 30 days, then won the JEDEC chair

The only listed pure-play MRAM maker lost a third of its value in a memory sell-off with no downgrade, then disclosed its executive chairs the JEDEC group deciding how persistence enters LPDDR. Q3 lands Wednesday.

Vincent JiangVincent Jiang · 3 min read
Share
Everspin Technologies CEO Sanjeev Aggarwal
1 / 6Slide 1 of 6
Sanjeev Aggarwal, president and CEO of Everspin Technologies, the only listed pure-play MRAM maker.

Everspin Technologies+2.62% — Everspin Technologies, up 2.62 percent today, the Chandler, Arizona maker of magnetoresistive memory (MRAM), a memory that keeps data when the power is cut, has 85 employees and a market value of $306.57 million 2. Its stock fell 31.8% in 30 days, from $18.47 on September 25 to $12.59 on October 23, alongside a broad semiconductor and AI-hardware sell-off 2. No analyst downgraded it. No negative company news appeared. Then, on October 20, the company disclosed something the sell-off did not price 1.

The seat at the standards table

Everspin announced that Steffen Hellmold, its vice president of corporate strategy, chairs a new JEDEC task group exploring an LPDDR persistent-memory standard, under the JC-42.6 Low Power Memories Subcommittee 1. JEDEC is the body that sets memory industry standards; LPDDR is the low-power DRAM ecosystem used in phones and beside AI accelerators.

The task group includes memory, controller and hyperscale data-center companies, and its work would let persistent memory ride the existing LPDDR ecosystem 1. Hellmold has 30-plus years in JEDEC work, and Everspin has shipped DDR STT-MRAM into data centers for more than ten years 1.

If that standard blesses MRAM as the persistence layer of LPDDR, content per AI-server memory module grows for the one listed pure-play. If DRAM vendors absorb persistence into their own parts instead, Everspin stays an industrial-and-defense niche chipmaker 1.

The tape versus the targets

The fundamentals did not cause the fall. Everspin reported record Q2 2026 revenue of $18.7 million, up 42% year over year, with non-GAAP earnings of $0.11 per diluted share, beating guidance, helped by a two-and-a-half-year, $40 million subcontract with a US prime defense contractor 2. Four analysts carry a consensus Buy and an average target of $25.50, more than double the tape; Maxim Group initiated at Buy with a $25 target, Needham holds Buy at $19 12.

The lowest analyst target is still 51% above the tape

$0$10$20$30Tape, Oct 23 close$12.59Needham$19Maxim Group$25Consensus, 4 analysts$25.5
Data
Value
Tape, Oct 23 close$12.59
Needham$19
Maxim Group$25
Consensus, 4 analysts$25.5
Everspin's closing price on October 23 versus analyst price targets, in US dollars per share. Consensus is the four-analyst average; Maxim initiated at Buy with a $25 target and Needham holds Buy at $19.1,2

Revenue climbed to a record $18.74 million in Q2 2026, up 42% year over year

1214161820Q3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '2618.74
Data
Revenue ($M)
Q3 '2412.09
Q4 '2413.24
Q1 '2513.14
Q2 '2513.2
Q3 '2514.06
Q4 '2514.8
Q1 '2614.87
Q2 '2618.74
Quarterly revenue in US$ millions, from Everspin's SEC filings via company_series, retrieved October 26, 2026.3

The swing factor for Wednesday, October 28, when Q3 lands, is timing 2. Guidance calls for revenue of $19.5 million to $20.5 million and non-GAAP EPS of $0.10 to $0.15, but management says the $40 million defense subcontract will not follow a straight line 2.

Two camps, one print on October 28

Two camps hold the stock. The sell-off camp cut it a third as high-beta memory. The analyst camp prices standard-setting optionality at double the tape. Beneath both sit DRAM vendors that could keep persistence for themselves versus the pure-play chairing the spec 1. TheJEDEC seat is an option, not revenue; nothing in the announcement prices MRAM into an LPDDR module yet 1. The print on October 28 decides which camp the valuation belongs to 1. Watch the defense subcontract's revenue timing first; the standard follows on JEDEC's clock, not the market's.

Get Chips by email, free

How AI demand is reshaping chipmakers, memory and the fabs behind them. In our daily email, every weekday.

Loading MRAM…

Reader comments

0 comments

    Chips

    Unimicron paid a record NT$10.08B for a plant: Nvidia is qualifying Kinsus anyway

    A record plant purchase gave Unimicron the factory Kinsus wanted: now Nvidia is grooming its rival anyway.

    Chips

    Infineon is inside Nvidia's 800-volt AI racks and Enphase's 900-volt transformers; Nov. 10 decides the margin

    Infineon's GaN power chips are now named into Nvidia's 800V racks and Enphase's AI transformers, but the November 10 results decide whether that design slot is profit or just revenue.

    Chips

    Cisco puts the memory bill on the price list, and Arista's quarter decides if the stack can pay

    Cisco raised published list prices for the first time since the memory shortage began squeezing its margins. The pass-through that partners absorbed deal by deal all year now sits in the catalog, and Arista's November 3 print shows whether the whole networking stack can charge for it.

    Chips

    Delta faces Vicor at the US ITC a second time, with royalties now $66.6 million a quarter

    Vicor's Section 337 case over AI-server power delivery names Delta Electronics, Foxconn and Quanta among twenty respondents, but Delta is the one that already lost to Vicor at the ITC in February 2025 and survived by redesigning around the patents.

    Chips

    OpenAI-backed Merge Labs licensed Butterfly Network's ultrasound chip for brain interfaces; Q3 due October 29

    Butterfly's ultrasound-on-chip is now the hardware inside two brain-computer-interface startups backed by OpenAI money, and Thursday's Q3 is the first print that could show licensing revenue against a loss-making quarter. The market has priced none of it.

    Chips

    IonQ reports SkyWater for the first time on November 5; D-Wave is the only outside customer with a deal

    The Minnesota fab IonQ bought on July 31 made money largely from IonQ itself; the first consolidated revenue guide, due November 5, shows what an outside customer actually pays, and the only one with a disclosed deal is D-Wave, down 55% this year and facing a class action.

    Get the newsletter

    The day's AI and market news, in your inbox every weekday.