Exelon asks FERC to delay PJM's 2030/31 capacity auction to 2030 as load forecasts hit 21.7%
Exelon, whose utilities buy power for about 10.7 million PJM customers, says the region's capacity market can no longer price AI-era demand three years ahead. Its own third-quarter filing shows the affordability squeeze that follows.
Richard Tangthree-minute read
Exelon asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on November 3 to change when PJM, the grid operator for the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest, buys its power 12. The complaint, docket EL27-11, would replace an auction held three years before delivery with a prompt one two months out, starting with the 2030/31 delivery year now scheduled for May 2027 12.
Exelon's+0.67% — Exelon, up 0.67 percent today six utilities serve about 10.7 million customers in PJM, and since separating its power plants with Constellation in 2022 it buys capacity rather than sells it 34. What broke, on Exelon's telling, is demand: large loads such as data centers now arrive on schedules no three-year forecast can track 15.
The three-year forecast no longer describes the grid it prices
The gap was set in a 2006 settlement, when a new plant took 33 months to build and load forecasts held steady 2. Both halves of that bargain have gone. Load adjustments in PJM's 2026 forecast reach 21.7 percent of summer peak four to five years out 2. In forecasts from 2017 through 2021 they never exceeded 2 percent 2.
Gas turbines now book five years ahead, and about 24 gigawatts of planned plants have abandoned signed interconnection agreements since 2020 without ever running 2. The last two auctions cleared at the $325 per MW-day cap federal regulators set, and still left the region short of its reliability requirement 2.
PJM's own May white paper, quoted in the complaint, says the design's foundational assumption "has been physically broken" 2. Exelon says later auctions will run with no cap at all 2.
The squeeze is already on Exelon's books
Third-quarter revenue rose 9 percent 4. Operating income fell 8 percent, the first year-over-year decline in eight quarters 6. The difference is regulatory. In August, Maryland's Public Service Commission awarded Pepco, Exelon's Washington-area utility, a $51 million rate increase 4. Pepco had asked for $120 million 4. The order also disallowed $180 million of plant, which Exelon wrote straight into operating and maintenance expense, and that write-off with heavier storm costs drove the 33 percent jump in operating and maintenance expense 4.
Exelon's operating income fell in Q3 2026 while revenue set an eight-quarter high
- Revenue
- Operating income
Data
| Revenue | Operating income | |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 '24 | $5.47B | $1.1B |
| Q1 '25 | $6.71B | $1.54B |
| Q2 '25 | $5.43B | $0.93B |
| Q3 '25 | $6.71B | $1.5B |
| Q4 '25 | $5.41B | $1.19B |
| Q1 '26 | $7.24B | $1.61B |
| Q2 '26 | $5.97B | $0.98B |
| Q3 '26 | $7.32B | $1.38B |
Adjusted earnings, which exclude the write-off, held at $0.87 a share 9. The same bill pressure that sent Exelon to FERC is already making state regulators take money back.
Exelon's capital spending has outrun operating cash flow in nine of the last ten quarters
- Capital spending
- Operating cash flow
Data
| Capital spending | Operating cash flow | |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 '24 | $1.7B | $1.46B |
| Q3 '24 | $1.7B | $1.69B |
| Q4 '24 | $1.94B | $1.43B |
| Q1 '25 | $1.95B | $1.2B |
| Q2 '25 | $2.01B | $1.51B |
| Q3 '25 | $2.14B | $2.3B |
| Q4 '25 | $2.43B | $1.24B |
| Q1 '26 | $2.36B | $1.72B |
| Q2 '26 | $2.2B | $1.95B |
| Q3 '26 | $2.24B | $1.74B |
PJM is not on Exelon's clock
PJM answered the next day, opposing fast-track handling and asking to move its reply from November 23 to December 21 2. Its board meets November 17 on the very auction at issue, and a separate stakeholder reform effort with more than 30 proposals convened November 13 23. Chief executive Calvin Butler put the physical stakes on record on November 9: last winter the Mid-Atlantic came within 15 minutes of curtailing power, with 400,000 customers exposed 8.
The clock is not the bottleneck; steel is
Exelon says so itself: a prompt auction alone will not solve affordability, and PJM urgently needs more generation 7. That is where the AI buildout now binds. FERC can change who pays for a wrong forecast; only new megawatts change what there is to buy. The value in this chain belongs to whoever delivers generation, wires and storage into PJM, not to anyone's four-year forecast.
Get Power by email, free
How AI's hunger for electricity moves utilities, power plants and the grid. In our daily email, every weekday.






